 |
 |
|
|
The model is based on the assumption that each participant in the negotiation
does what is in his or her expected best self-interest.
It starts by calculating how each participant regards all of the other participants
in the negotiation and evaluates their relative strengths, taking into account the
coalitions that each stakeholder likely has. The model develops an assessment of how
each of the other participants would react to a proposal from a particular participant,
how likely they would be to accede, compromise, or resist a proposal. The model
calculates all the proposals that each participant would make to each of the other participants.
Each participant then chooses the best proposal in his or her interest, or the one that they
cannot refuse, and the model then calculates the resulting new positions and uses these as a
starting point for the next round. It not only shows whether or not there is a negotiated solution
acceptable to all, or all those necessary to make it happen, but how each individual changes position
round by round.
In addition, it indicates what proposals were not made that could have been and then tracks how
that would change the negotiated outcome, what we call Missed Opportunities.
|
|
| |
Negotiation Strategies Home |
Our Approach |
Methodology & Concepts |
Consulting Services |
Case Studies |
Track Record |
FAQ
|
| |
Home |
Litigation Risk Management
& Settlement Valuation |
Negotiation Strategies |
About LRMI |
Contact |
| |
Litigation Risk Management Institute
145 Forest Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301
(650) 327-3372
All content ©2000 LRMI
|